After figures were released showing that ridership in New York City has increased by 2.3% for buses and 6.8% for subways, and 5% for Metro-North and the Long Island Railroad*, presumably attributable to soaring gasoline prices, an editorial in today's Daily News once again excoriates State Senator Sheldon Silver for not rubber-stamping Mayor Bloomberg's wrong approach to congestion pricing.
*Source: The New York Times
Why is it that the Daily News, Richard Ravitch, and Mayor Bloomberg seek to impose an additional burden, by tolling the free East River bridges, on already overtaxed and underserved New York City residents? The drivers coming from New Jersey, and the counties of Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, and Fairfield County, Connecticut—those riders, who contribute the greatest amount to congestion and pollution, would have received a discount for tolls paid. Any new congestion plan must eliminate that discount.
A far more equitable, and more effective approach to congestion pricing would double the tolls on the Henry Hudson, Throgs Neck, Triborough and Whitestone bridges, and add $8.00 "Welcome to New York City" tolls on the L.I.E., the Grand Central, the Southern and Northern State Parkways, and at the exits into the city from the Holland and Lincoln Tunnels, and the George Washington Bridge. That would cut a lot more traffic, and provide much greater funding for mass transit. Drivers from those areas have access to NJ Transit, Metro-North, or the Long Island Railroad, and Metro-North and Long Island Railroad riders are already subsidized by the state to a much greater degree than are New York City Transit users, who pay a greater share of transit costs than do riders of mass transit anywhere in the United States.
To show just how inequitable the Bloomberg approach is to outer-borough residents, I've added together the household median incomes of Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland and Fairfield counties, and come up with an average median income for those surrounding areas of $70,912.00. That's quite a bit more than the average of Kings, Bronx, Queens, Manhattan and Richmond counties, which is only $39,850.00*. If we're going to have congestion pricing, the fees should come from the majority of drivers who are also better-equipped to pay—not from city residents.
Finally, the Daily News once again mourns the loss of the $354 million that would have bought 300 new express buses, and very minor improvements to four of our twenty-six subway lines. I, too, will miss those improvements, but without major reforms at the MTA, reforms not included in PlaNY 2030, those promises, too, would likely have been broken.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Mass Transit Use is Rising
Posted by Cameron Williams at 3:16 PM
Labels: congestion pricing, mass transit
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
MTA may fight panel's hefty pay hikes for transit workers
By Pete Donohue
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Saturday, August 15th 2009
The MTA is considering challenging an arbitration panel's decision to grant transit workers generous wage hikes, officials said Friday.
A state judge can throw out a contract after concluding arbitrators didn't properly apply the criteria mandated by the legislation, including an employer's ability to pay wages and benefits.
The pact grants transit workers staggered annual raises totaling 4%, 4% and 3.5% over the three-year contract.
MTA officials said it would increase costs by $350 million.
The major provisions in the contract crafted by the arbitrators mirror the terms supported last year by MTA CEO Elliot Sander and NYC Transit President Howard Roberts before direct talks with union boss Roger Toussaint ended and the two sides turned to arbitration to finalize a deal. Sander resigned in May.
The MTA under acting CEO Helena Williams tried unsuccessfully to steer the panel away from the framework supported by Sander and Roberts, concluding it spelled a bad financial deal for the authority, even if it included removing conductors from some subway lines.
A union spokesman said the MTA's legal review is "another attempt by the MTA to mask its incompetence."
玩美女人同志聊天室666成人kyo成人動漫台灣情色網88 school情色圖鋼管舞sex520貼影片a片網站巨乳影片吉澤明步無碼歐美自拍慧慈偷拍性感女優自拍與偷拍歐美免費影片欣賞av女優影片美女圖庫吊帶襪美女dudu sex熊貓圖貼區av成人影城日本素人大全集人體彩繪模特兒85cc免費成人影片同志交友性感美腿gogo2sex com正妹交友ggooroom 18免費視訊辣妹吃漢俱樂部火影忍者a圖裸體辣妹超熟女18sxe成人影城聊天室交友凹凸情趣用品av免費影片視訊妹妹照片一覽男同志貼圖成人色情影片色情偷窺波霸美女老師檳榔西施自拍照片85cc免費影片觀看卡通ss369成人色網avi播放程式下載免費a片線上看卡通18美少女圖
77p2p影片區hi5 tv 免費影片xxx383美女寫真aa一夜情台中援交妹視訊甜心寶貝直播貼片av成人網g8mm 視訊壞朋友論壇視訊美女msvt中部人聊天室視訊網愛聊天室網路援交168論壇辣妹貼圖新竹援交38ga片下載全國最大俱樂部1007視訊xvideo打飛機專用網哈尼視訊援交友aio34c蒼井空影片下載avdvd69性殿dodo豆豆聊天室色美眉部落格 2,視訊主播脫衣秀台南視訊月宮貼圖情趣 商品拓網交友-情色視訊拓網交友情色視訊免費視訊美女,情人視訊網自拍線上av免費影片一葉情貼影禁區kiss168一葉情貼影色影cu成人bt色站girl5320cu成人bt色片打飛機專用網
thank for share, it is very important .￣︿￣..................................................
concluding it spelled a bad financial deal for the authority, even if it included removing conductors from some subway lines.
Hai, nice post and thanks for sharing the link
I LIKE IT
Zanzibar Holiday Packages
Cheap Zanzibar holidays
Post a Comment